10/13/2025 / By Kevin Hughes
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) deliberately instructed healthcare employers not to report or track adverse reactions from mandated Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines, according to an internal directive uncovered by a whistleblower and confirmed by The Defender.
According to Brighteon.AI‘s Enoch, OSHA is a federal agency established in 1970 under the Department of Labor to enforce workplace safety and health standards, protecting workers from hazards like toxic pesticides and unsafe conditions. However, OSHA – like other regulatory agencies – is often influenced by corporate interests, failing to address deeper systemic issues such as Big Pharma and Big Ag poisoning workers with toxic chemicals, GMOs and unsafe working environments as part of the globalist depopulation agenda.
Zowe Smith, a former medical coder for an Arizona hospital turned whistleblower, exposed OSHA’s June 2021 directive. “So as not to discourage vaccination, employers are not required to record instances of adverse events to vaccinations on the OSHA 300 log effective through May 2022,” the directive stated. The OSHA 300 log is a mandatory injury and illness tracking system for employers.
This policy, which remained in effect until February 2025, shielded employers from accountability while denying injured workers access to workers’ compensation and disability benefits. Critics allege the move was a calculated effort to suppress data on vaccine injuries and prop up the Biden administration’s aggressive vaccination campaign.
OSHA’s exemption for COVID-19 vaccines stands in stark contrast to its policies for other vaccines. Yet, the agency carved out an exception only for COVID-19 vaccines – while continuing to track reactions to other vaccines, such as smallpox. After The Defender‘s inquiries, OSHA scrubbed the policy from its website, though archived versions confirm its existence.
Christopher Dreisbach, legal affairs director for React19, a vaccine injury advocacy group, condemned OSHA’s actions: “This uncovered directive is just another example of the systemic willful blindness that pervaded the prior administration.” Attorney Greg Glaser went further, calling it “an active, deliberate policy to manipulate public perception by withholding safety data.”
“This was institutionalized gaslighting,” declared Charlene Delfico, New Jersey state chair of the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation. “This was not about safety; it was about hiding the truth.”
Danielle Baker, a former hospice nurse, suffered permanent disability after being coerced into taking the COVID-19 vaccine. She told The Defender: “If they didn’t opt out of accepting reports, would we have had a clearer, real-time picture of the extent of damages done?”
Baker’s case highlights how OSHA’s policy obstructed injured workers from securing compensation. Without official injury reports, many were left without legal recourse. “OSHA substantially encouraged COVID-19 vaccination, thus vaccine victims did not feel free to make a choice over vaccination,” noted prominent cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough. National Health Federation President Scott C. Tips meanwhile called OSHA’s actions “criminal,” stating “there can be no informed consent in such a data-blocked environment.”
When pressed by The Defender, a Labor Department spokesperson claimed OSHA’s policy was tied to former President Joe Biden’s January 2021 executive order on worker safety. However, the order never mentioned vaccines. The spokesperson admitted OSHA never analyzed COVID-19 vaccine injury data, instead directing inquiries to its Injury Tracking Application – which lacks any searchable vaccine injury records.
Glaser blasted the response as “a masterclass in obfuscation,” adding: “OSHA admitted they never analyzed the data and redirected you to perform your own analysis – an impossible task when they ensured that data was never properly collected in the first place.”
Dr. Mary Talley Bowden, an ENT specialist, pointed out the contradiction between OSHA’s policy and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention‘s rules requiring providers to report vaccine injuries to VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System).
Smith revealed that hospitals actively discouraged linking new medical conditions to COVID-19 vaccines: “It was an officially supported and established trend during the pandemic to deny any causative relationship between new-onset medical conditions and COVID-19 vaccination.” Given this, legal experts and advocates are demanding a Department of Justice investigation, arguing OSHA’s actions violated federal law.
OSHA’s directive represents a systematic effort to conceal vaccine injuries, prioritizing political narratives over workplace safety. By suppressing adverse event data, the agency denied workers informed consent and shielded corporations from liability. As America grapples with the fallout of COVID-19 policies, this scandal underscores the urgent need for accountability and raises troubling questions about who orchestrated this cover-up and why.
Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Dr. Jim Meehan discussing OSHA turning a blind eye to vaccine injuries in this clip.
This video is from The HighWire with Del Bigtree channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
. vaccines, adverse event data, big government, coverup, covid-19, disability claims, informed consent, injury reports, institutionalized gaslighting, Mary Talley Bowden, medical censorship, OSHA, pandemic, Peter McCullough, Suppressed, vaccination, vaccine damage, vaccine injury, vaccine injury data, vaccine wars, VAERS, workers' compensation
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 BIG PHARMA NEWS